Krishnamurti and Belief

This is a tricky one, Krishnamurti does a very good job at explaining something that is hard to grasp, or - if we do understand what he means - to put into practice in our lives: Belief hinders true understanding.

The fact is, I am very aware of the concept that it indeed is best to have no beliefs … yet, I say in my essay BELIEF, that one aspect of happiness is to have a belief one can trust, one that gives us peace of mind and comfort. And in the footnote I say: 

Our mind is designed for belief: beliefs are an inescapable part of our mental fabric; and with so many destructive & intolerant beliefs, as a counter balance we need beliefs that are positive & supportive.

But the undeniable and inconvenient truth is contained in K’s writings, and I allude to that truth throughout my book en.light.en.ment: Beliefs taint our view of reality, they indeed hinder true understanding.

Belief hinders true understanding

If we had no belief, what would happen to us? Shouldn’t we be very frightened of what might happen? If we had no pattern of action, based on a belief - either in God, or in communism, or in socialism, or in imperialism, or in some kind of religious formula, some dogma in which we are conditioned - we should feel utterly lost, shouldn’t we? And is not this acceptance of a belief the covering up of that fear - the fear of being really nothing, of being empty? After all, a cup is useful only when it is empty; and a mind that is filled with beliefs, with dogmas, with assertions, with quotations, is really an uncreative mind; it is merely a repetitive mind. To escape from that fear - that fear of emptiness, that fear of loneliness, that fear of stagnation, of not arriving, not succeeding, not achieving, not being something, not becoming something - is surely one of the reasons, is it not, why we accept beliefs so eagerly and greedily? And, through acceptance of belief, do we understand ourselves? On the contrary. A belief, religious or political, obviously hinders the understanding of ourselves. It acts as a screen through which we look at ourselves. And can we look at ourselves without beliefs? If we remove these beliefs, the many beliefs that one has, is there anything left to look at? If we have no beliefs with which the mind has identified itself, then the mind, without identification, is capable of looking at itself as it is - and then, surely there is the beginning of the understanding of oneself.

The Book of Life, February 14, Harper San Francisco, 1995